tchollingsworth at gmail.com
Fri Jul 19 20:39:33 UTC 2013
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Joe Orton <jorton at redhat.com> wrote:
> If we really must pollute the URL space with fixed common locations for
> shared assets then we should definitely not use a generic name like
> "/assets". We should minimize interference with the URL space.
> "/.assets" "/.packaged-assets" "/_packaged_assets/" or something like
This came up on the devel list too.
How does "/_sysassets/" sound? It's a lot shorter than
"/_packaged_assets/" while essentially conveying the same meaning.
It also doesn't conflict with anything known to Google:
More information about the packaging