[Fedora-packaging] Why don't we write in guidelines that BR: perl is mandatory for perl packages?

Parag N(पराग़) panemade at gmail.com
Tue Jul 23 09:21:59 UTC 2013

    I have a discussion going on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979677 where my basis of
discussion is that "BR: perl is mandatory" is not written in any
guidelines. Technically, I can understand what perl people there are trying
to tell me.
    So, question is why is it so hard to write in perl guidelines that perl
packages should BR: perl?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20130723/1483927c/attachment.html>

More information about the packaging mailing list