[Fedora-packaging] Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2013-06-20 16:00 - 17:15 UTC)

[Stephen Gallagher]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 06/20/2013 01:15 PM, James Antill wrote:

> * Policy around packagers not getting an exception for a library
> or refusing to comply with an unbundling ruling - 
> https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/301  (spot, 16:41:10) * ACTION:
> policy draft approved (+1:6, 0:0, -1:0)  (spot, 16:43:46)
> 


According to the proposal, the way to deal with a maintainer not
dealing with a bundling problem is to kick it to FESCo. What do you
see as FESCo's responsibility here?

I see the following possibilities:

1) FESCo orders the package blocked from the distro (may be hard to
enforce for packages with many children.

2) FESCo takes away package-ownership and finds a new caretaker for it
(Hard to accomplish since FESCo has no resources to direct)

3) FESCo sends a sternly-worded email to the maintainer

4) ???

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlHDRP8ACgkQeiVVYja6o6NqOwCfWkJC/Cs6EWeVuMI7nbkRMafP
akgAn0VsAYWciLdzrATm5Na05AwndwGj
=Dldt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----