[Fedora-packaging] Inconsistencies in Python package naming

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:37:46AM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "BK" == Bohuslav Kabrda <bkabrda at redhat.com> writes:
> 
> BK> Let's make it mandatory for all the Python package names to be
> BK> prefixed with python-/python3-.
> 
> You won't get any argument from me; I've long thought that the "py"
> naming exception is bollocks and that python deserves no special
> treatment here.  Do note, however, that even if we changed the
> guidelines, this would have no effect on existing packages because we
> wouldn't dream of requiring any sort of renaming.
> 
+1

-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20130328/70b0a40f/attachment.sig>