[Fedora-packaging] SCL in Fedora
Marcela Mašláňová
mmaslano at redhat.com
Fri Nov 1 10:34:58 UTC 2013
On 31/10/13 17:22, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 08:47:48AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> A prefix is necessary to make the scl packages unique from non-scl packages.
>
> As a sysadmin, this seems obvious to me. Marcela, can you explain the
> reasoning in _not_ doing it?
>
>
Packages are already unique. They have prefix e.g. ruby193. If we force
packagers add scl-ruby193 prefix, would it be more unique?
To not have two same names for collection should be solved by Change
proposal approved probably by FESCo.
Marcela
More information about the packaging
mailing list