[Fedora-packaging] SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 03:43:51PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Toshio Kuratomi (a.badger at gmail.com) said: 
> > == Filesystem Location ==
> > A straw poll was taken about the filesystem location of SCLs.  A few FPC
> > members were willing to use /opt but others were heavily opposed to it.
> > Everyone was okay with using /usr/scl (or the plural form /usr/scls).  So
> > I think that needs to become the scl root dir (is that the right term?) for
> > Fedora.
> > 
[snip]
> 
> 
> Ngggh. If the point is to have a stack that lives outside of the OS... then
> it should *live outside of the OS*, not be grafted into a subpoint of the
> OS. (IOW, I disagree.)
> 
I suppose the counter example to the argument that because the directory is
under /usr it is grafted onto the OS would be /usr/local.  But I don't
know that any of the FPC members were looking at it in this light.

-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20131101/1f8c117f/attachment.sig>