[Fedora-packaging] SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 04:12:42PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> 
> Unfortunately, FHS is dead upstream. Linux Foundation made an attempt at
> resuscitation about two years ago, but that immediately stalled again.
> 
> I filed this <https://bugs.linuxfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1164> after
> talking to Jeff Licquia at LinuxCon, but it hasn't gotten any response.
> If we feel that FHS continues to be important, maybe we need to get involved
> in that upstream.
> 
<nod>  -- Is there an FHS group to get involved with or does it need to be
a reboot?  Grab a few Debian, Ubuntu, Arch, gentoo, FSF, etc people to look
at what shortcomings we find in the current FHS draft and work on having
those addressed one at a time?

-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20131105/d790920b/attachment.sig>