[Fedora-packaging] SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
R P Herrold
herrold at owlriver.com
Thu Nov 7 18:43:48 UTC 2013
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013, Joe Julian wrote:
> Which implies the only requirement is that the SCL installer would have to ask
> before replacing a package (assuming /opt/<package>). The LANANA registration
> and subsequent package hierarchy would be simplest, safest, and most logical,
> imho.
The LSB folks at our weekly bug triage considered the bug
filed by Matt Miller on the topic [1]. The FHS and LANANA
space is mature without much activity, and so my comment 2 in
that bug was designed to permit a 'fast-track' assignment of a
/opt/fedora/ namespace, for use as the project sees fit
We need to do some infrastructure work with LANANA to
communicate this well within the FHS documentation, but as
Jeff's summary indicates, absent some major objection being
surfaced, will, I think, be the way the LSB proceeds in its
next update (usually done at six month intervals)
-- Russ herrold
[1] https://bugs.linuxfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1164
More information about the packaging
mailing list