[Fedora-packaging] scl_prefix vs _scl_prefix

[Remi Collet]

Le 08/11/2013 08:58, Bohuslav Kabrda a écrit :

> Extending as in "building more packages into the same collection"? You shouldn't be able to do that, that is by desing of RHSCL afaik.

Yes, this is my first thought.

Toshio, can you please update the Guildelines draft about this ?

"All SCL packages MUST be part of en existing collection in Fedora/EPEL
(cannot extend a collection from another vendor, such as RHSCL or RHDTS)"



Remi.