[Fedora-packaging] cajun package review status?

Ankur Sinha sanjay.ankur at gmail.com
Fri Nov 22 10:45:24 UTC 2013


On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 11:21 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've prepared a spec for the CAJUN JSON API - it is a build dependency
> for the new reSIProcate with WebRTC support
> 
> Nobody has replied to the review request however, have I missed some
> detail in the request[1]?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Daniel
> 
> 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012337

Perhaps a review swap on the devel list will get someone to take it up?

There isn't a team that goes review by review, you need to communicate
with the community and get someone to review your package. 
-- 
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha

Join Fedora! Come talk to us!
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20131122/2554d685/attachment.sig>


More information about the packaging mailing list