[Fedora-packaging] SCL -- buildtime information

Vít Ondruch vondruch at redhat.com
Wed Oct 9 07:36:58 UTC 2013


Dne 8.10.2013 14:22, Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> Vít Ondruch wrote, at 10/08/2013 04:59 PM +9:00:
>> Dne 8.10.2013 09:36, Jan Kaluža napsal(a):
>>> On 10/08/2013 07:18 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>>> Dne 7.10.2013 22:24, Toshio Kuratomi napsal(a):
>>>>> * Instead we could build for the main Fedora Repo.  If we do this, 
>>>>> the
>>>>> spec
>>>>>    file, git repo name, and srpm package name all need to match.  
>>>>> That
>>>>> means
>>>>>    we'd have a separate git-level package for each package+scl
>>>>> combination.
>>>>>    So if we had scl-php5.6 and we needed a php and php-gettext 
>>>>> package
>>>>> for it
>>>>>    we'd need separate git-level packages named scl-php5.6-php and
>>>>>    scl-php5.6-php-gettext.
>>>>
>>>> This goes exactly against the basic premise on which SCL were build 
>>>> and
>>>> that is: "The SCL package must be buildable from the very same .spec
>>>> file into regular package as well as SCL package.".
>>>
>>> I'm not following SCL in Fedora, but even the first way suggested by 
>>> Toshio is against this basic premise. When you have another .spec 
>>> file in extra branch, it's not the "very same .spec file"
>>
>> Different branch does not mean the files are different. It is just 
>> different branch. You can merge, cherry-pick, etc.
>
> Note that this is completely against what you said before:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2013-March/008936.html 
>
>

I remember that and that still holds. SCL is not my design, though.


Vít


More information about the packaging mailing list