[Fedora-packaging] critical path security update policy

[Björn Persson]

Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 12:06:30AM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> > When the maintainer Martin Stransky submitted the update he could
> > have chosen to set the stable karma threshold to 1 or 2. Then the
> > process of pushing the update to stable would have started
> > automatically as soon as the critical path requirement was
> > fulfilled. But since Martin left the  
> 
> That's not necessarily good either. A bad update intended to fix a
> critical security problem can be worse than the issue it was meant to
> fix.

To be clear, I didn't say that it would have been good. I merely
explained that it was Martin's choice, not a policy.

Björn Persson
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signatur
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20150419/8a8b7272/attachment.sig>