[Fedora-packaging] Second opinion needed on location of static arch independent data
jonathan.underwood at gmail.com
Sat Jul 25 14:59:49 UTC 2015
On 25 July 2015 at 01:37, Jonathan Underwood
<jonathan.underwood at gmail.com> wrote:
> During the review of mkdocs, which is a python package for
> generating static webpages, I (as reviewer) noticed that it installs a
> My feeling is that this static architecture independent data should
> really be installed under /usr/share/mkdocs to comply with the FHS.
> But the packager (quite reasonably) points out that other packages
> such as sphinx install templates and themes under
> So, the question is: is it acceptable for this package to install arch
> independent themes (i.e. non-python code) under
> /usr/lib/python3/site-packages ?
As an extra data point, it seems Debian places sphinx themes under /usr/share:
More information about the packaging