[Fedora-packaging] Doubt about the name for a package mkdocs

William Moreno williamjmorenor at gmail.com
Fri Jun 12 16:15:58 UTC 2015


Hello

I am trying to package mkdocs , it si similar to sphinx, but not as
powerfull, but can be very usefull.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230963

I am packaging only one version build with phyton 3 and naming it mkdocs,
but I am not sure it is better to name this docs as python3-mkdocs and
build python-mkdocs also.

I think than build python-mkdocs and python3-mkdocs with Provides: mkdocs
in the Python3 package can work.

Really I not sure how to proceed in this case, but I think if it would be good
to have both versions available for booth Python releases and provide by
default the version for Python 3 when a user install mkdocs with dnf.

William Moreno Reyes
http://about.me/williamjmorenor
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20150612/b5b075f7/attachment.html>


More information about the packaging mailing list