[Fedora-packaging] Doubt about the name for a package mkdocs

[William Moreno]

2015-06-12 11:19 GMT-06:00 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou at pingoured.fr>:

> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 01:03:56PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 06:59:04PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > > What would be the advantage of having two versions?
> > > Well the python universe is still very much py2 but the future is py3
> > > and we should aim for it, so it makes sense to have both :)
> >
> > Well, sure, for modules, but from the web page, this looks like an
> > end-user application. Why would anyone but its own developers care
> > which Python it is written in (as long as it's a supported version, of
> > course)?
>
> I can see the argument and that's a thought worth having :)
> You could indeed only have a single py3 version.
>
> Eventually you could always re-introduce the py2 if someone was to
> complain that
> it's not there (because the're building on it or for whatever reason).
>
>
Thanks all for the feedback

I will keep olny the python3 package and if someone ask for the python2
build will make the python2 build as subpackage.

By the way it will be nice if someone take the review of the package :)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20150612/d900800e/attachment.html>