[Bug 230608] missing config.h in latest -14

Paul Howarth paul at city-fan.org
Fri Mar 2 13:05:41 UTC 2007


Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 14:38 -0500, bugzilla at redhat.com wrote:
>> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
>> comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
>>
>> Summary: missing config.h in latest -14
>>
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230608
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com  2007-03-01 14:38 EST -------
>> Balint,
>>
>> Yes, this is related to our splitting out perl-devel in -14 - 'yum install
>> perl-devel' should fix the problem.  See bug #226276
> 
> AFAIS, this change seems to break building of any perl-module.
> 
> => All perl modules' spec files from now on would require to change all
> perl-modules to "BuildRequire: perl-devel" - 
> Are you seriously wanting this?
> 
> As this thing doesn't seem to be baked yet[1], and as I don't want to
> see FE-6 and FE-5 being locked out from updates, for now, I will ignore
> this issue on rawhide, i.e. you will likely see broken EVRs between
> rawhide and older FE, on my perl-modules, soon.

The same issue will affect the grepmail update I'm just about to do as 
well. I'm not adding the perl=devel buildreq just yet until a firm 
decision on whether all modules have to BR: perl=devel is made.

> [1] Why is such a massive change being introduced such kind of late in a
> release cycle? IMO, it's way to late, and should be postponed to F8 once
> things have been sorted out.

It's clearly come about as a result of the perl spec cleanup during the 
merge review, but I think splitting out perl-devel at this point is a 
bit late given the number of packages that will need changing (unless as 
Ralf suggests, the hack of adding perl-devel to the FC7 buildroot is made).

Paul.




More information about the perl-devel mailing list