[Bug 230608] missing config.h in latest -14
paul at city-fan.org
Fri Mar 2 17:47:28 UTC 2007
On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 10:17 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 13:05 +0000, Paul Howarth wrote:
> > Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > >> ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-03-01 14:38 EST -------
> > >> Balint,
> > >>
> > >> Yes, this is related to our splitting out perl-devel in -14 - 'yum install
> > >> perl-devel' should fix the problem. See bug #226276
> > >
> > > AFAIS, this change seems to break building of any perl-module.
> > >
> > > => All perl modules' spec files from now on would require to change all
> > > perl-modules to "BuildRequire: perl-devel" -
> > > Are you seriously wanting this?
> > >
> > > As this thing doesn't seem to be baked yet, and as I don't want to
> > > see FE-6 and FE-5 being locked out from updates, for now, I will ignore
> > > this issue on rawhide, i.e. you will likely see broken EVRs between
> > > rawhide and older FE, on my perl-modules, soon.
> > The same issue will affect the grepmail update I'm just about to do as
> > well. I'm not adding the perl=devel buildreq just yet until a firm
> > decision on whether all modules have to BR: perl=devel is made.
> > >  Why is such a massive change being introduced such kind of late in a
> > > release cycle? IMO, it's way to late, and should be postponed to F8 once
> > > things have been sorted out.
> > It's clearly come about as a result of the perl spec cleanup during the
> > merge review, but I think splitting out perl-devel at this point is a
> > bit late given the number of packages that will need changing (unless as
> > Ralf suggests, the hack of adding perl-devel to the FC7 buildroot is made).
> I don't see any fault in adding perl-devel to the FC7 buildroot, with
> the caveat that it will not be there in FC8+. Thoughts?
Works for me (literally, in my own buildsystem... as well as
More information about the perl-devel