time for perl 5.10.x in devel?

[Tom "spot" Callaway]

On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 15:41 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 09:25 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:46 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:35 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > Maybe the solution could simply be to be able to add some comments in the
> > > > pacakgedb, telling who is really allowed to touch the package?
> > > > and select 'group members can commit?'.
> > > 
> > > IMO, the easiest approach would be to use "perl-sig" or similar (eg. an
> > > "email alias" or a packagedb "alias" (should such thing exist)) as
> > > owner ;)
> > 
> > Which, we can't do, without dirty hacks, currently.
> > 
> > You should talk to Toshio about this.
> Me? I don't have a problem when the packagedb stuff denotes you to
> maintain all these packages all alone, because nobody can distinguish
> them from "true Spot" packages nor when these packages doen't receive
> cpancheck from because of this.
> 
> This is solely your problem - Sooner or later.

I don't have any problem with this. They'll show up in cpancheck as
packages that I need to fix. You're the one who is getting worked up
over technical limitations.

~spot