Fwd: rpms/perl/devel perl.spec,1.246,1.247
Tom "spot" Callaway
tcallawa at redhat.com
Sat Dec 19 03:30:23 UTC 2009
On 12/18/2009 10:29 PM, Chris Weyl wrote:
> I could go either way on this; but I think we should pick an approach
> and stick with it, unless there's compelling reasons otherwise... And
> the current approach seems to be working well.
> Also... Even if we exclude these modules w/o providing them as
> sub-packages, we ought to ensure that they're still pulled in by
> perl-core (and perl itself, when we make the
> perl-core/perl/perl-minimal switch).
Agreed on both points.
More information about the perl-devel