perl @INC (paths) again

[Ralf Corsepius]

On 01/31/2011 04:36 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 01/31/2011 04:21 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
>> Hello,
>> because some questions and blocked reviews [1]. I feel that we really
>> need discuss our @INC paths once again.
>
> Thanks for trying to launch such a discussion.
>
> I am blocking these reviews, because I feel redhat.cz has drawn
> uncommunicated, arguable and questionable decisions, which are at risk
> of to run down Fedora's perl.
>
>> This is only proposal and there are also other possibilities, how to
>> create specific directory for installation of users rpms. I'd like to
>> change this proposal to FPC guidelines maybe for next Fedora, therefore
>> I really like to know your opinions.
>
> I promise to read it in depth and to think about it, but I won't have
> much time this week.

Marcela, what are we supposed to think of the fact you are continuing to 
accept packages which do not install into vendor_dir?

I interpret these actions of yours, as you not being interested in 
settling the issues, but you wanting to implement facts by brute-force.

This is not helpful.