perl @INC (paths) again

[Emmanuel Seyman]

* Iain Arnell [03/02/2011 09:31] :
>
> I agree. Marcela's proposal is fine in principle, but unlikely to
> achieve much in practice.

I have to admit this is my conclusion as well.

> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Paul Howarth <paul at city-fan.org> wrote:
>
> > So overall I'm in favour of using the F-15 set of paths (assuming the
> > typos are fixed) but sticking with the vendor directories for everything
> > apart from the perl core.
> 
> +1 to that.

Add my +1 to the list.

Emmanuel