perl @INC (paths) again

[Ralf Corsepius]

On 02/07/2011 11:43 PM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Iain Arnell [03/02/2011 09:31] :
>>
>> I agree. Marcela's proposal is fine in principle, but unlikely to
>> achieve much in practice.
>
> I have to admit this is my conclusion as well.
>
>> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Paul Howarth<paul at city-fan.org>  wrote:
>>
>>> So overall I'm in favour of using the F-15 set of paths (assuming the
>>> typos are fixed) but sticking with the vendor directories for everything
>>> apart from the perl core.
>>
>> +1 to that.
>
> Add my +1 to the list.

Then you are likely able to explain why you want to see this implemented?

I fail to see _any_ advantage this approach provides, but consider it to 
provide only regressons what Fedora 14 had.

Ralf