[Bug 689709] Circular and missing dependecies
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Mar 23 12:52:34 UTC 2011
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689709
--- Comment #11 from Iain Arnell <iarnell at gmail.com> 2011-03-23 08:52:32 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> I am insisting on bcond_without, because
>
> our interest is Fedora, a distro which is incrementally built and want to test
> our packages "to the max" as part of our regular works whenever we build our
> packages.
>
> i.e. people who are trying to bootstrap from scratch for whatever reasons, are
> not of any importance and need to be taught that Fedora is incrementally built.
> Apart of perl, they will be facing similar issue all over the place, e.g. when
> building gcc/glibc/kernel (also an incrementally built system).
I agree entirely with the argument. Rebuilders who need this should be forced
to add --with bootstrap. But the bcond magic to do that is bcond_with, not
bcond_without:
# Handle conditional builds. %bcond_with is for case when feature is
# default off and needs to be activated with --with ... command line
# switch. %bcond_without is for the dual case.
#
# %bcond_with foo defines symbol with_foo if --with foo was specified on
# command line.
# %bcond_without foo defines symbol with_foo if --without foo was *not*
# specified on command line.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the perl-devel
mailing list