[Bug 1152319] perl-Module-Starter produces invalid license identifiers

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152319



--- Comment #12 from Paul Howarth <paul at city-fan.org> ---
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #9)
> (In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #7)
> > (In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #6)
> > > You are right that the patch is wrong. The only slnames that need a
> > > correction are the LGPL's. I think more appropriate place for a dependency
> > > on Software::License is Module::Build rather then Module::Starter.
> > 
> > That's what I thought too but it might introduce bootstrapping issues, with
> > the bootstrap Module::Build not having the dependency and the dual-lived one
> > subsequently introducing it.
> 
> I'm aware of it. I will put the dependency into "not bootstrapping"
> condition.

If you do that, are you then going to post-bootstrap rebuild every package that
pulled in Module::Build during the bootstrap process, to make sure it still
builds OK with Software::License in the buildroot?

Adding bootstrap-dependent Requires (as opposed to bootstrap-dependent
RuildRequires) has a much bigger impact in terms of post-bootstrap rebuilds I
think.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EMr3NF8Gij&a=cc_unsubscribe