ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org back online

[Josh Boyer]

On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Dan Horák <dan at danny.cz> wrote:
> Josh Boyer píše v So 01. 01. 2011 v 08:37 -0500:
>> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Adrian Reber <adrian at lisas.de> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 10:26:42AM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 01:25:04AM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote:
>> >> > > That one failed, but I fixed a few more items and eventually it worked:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=114662
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I guess we're good for now?
>> >> >
>> >> > So far I see no more errors. Thanks for your work!
>> >>
>> >> Found another problem:
>> >>
>> >> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> >>   File "/usr/sbin/kojid", line 1437, in runTask
>> >>     response = (handler.run(),)
>> >>   File "/usr/sbin/kojid", line 1513, in run
>> >>     return self.handler(*self.params,**self.opts)
>> >>   File "/usr/sbin/kojid", line 1934, in handler
>> >>     h = self.readSRPMHeader(srpm)
>> >>   File "/usr/sbin/kojid", line 2007, in readSRPMHeader
>> >>     h = koji.get_rpm_header(fo)
>> >>   File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/koji/__init__.py", line 787, in get_rpm_header
>> >>     hdr = ts.hdrFromFdno(fo.fileno())
>> >>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/rpm/transaction.py", line 154, in hdrFromFdno
>> >>     raise rpm.error("error reading package header")
>> >> error: error reading package header
>> >>
>> >> http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=114707
>> >>
>> >> Sounds like: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/buildsys/2010-August/003224.html
>>
>> Yes, it does sound like that.  I would have thought it to be fixed in
>> koji 1.6.0 already though.  Maybe not.  Dan, do you know if the
>> workaround is still needed in 1.6?
>
> Seems it's still needed, but I didn't try to push it to upstream as the
> workaround is rather a dirty hack. I'm surprised it should be needed in
> the ppc koji where the builder and hub are on the same local network
> AFAIK.

OK.  I'll try to patch them soon.  I've seen it on machines elsewhere
that are sitting on the same switch even, so apparently it's not that
uncommon?

josh