Taskotron wiki page

[Martin Krizek]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kamil Paral" <kparal at redhat.com>
> To: "Fedora QA Development" <qa-devel at lists.fedoraproject.org>, "Josef Skladanka" <jskladan at redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 4:00:33 PM
> Subject: Re: Taskotron wiki page
> 
> > I also updated
> > 
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Tools
> > 
> > with the list of our current projects. If you see something missing, please
> > add it. Thanks.
> > 
> 
> Josef, I find this quite confusing:
> 
> https://bitbucket.org/rajcze/resultsdb
> https://bitbucket.org/rajcze/resultsdb_api
> https://bitbucket.org/rajcze/resultsdb_frontend
> https://fedorahosted.org/ResultsDB/
> https://git.fedorahosted.org/git/ResultsDB.git
> 
> What is the canonical source? Where should people report issues? Please, pick
> one location to keep the project in (it seems we're going bitbucket, or
> bitbucket+phab way) and kill the other site. Also make sure issues can't be
> reported on two different places, and forward people to the single one. And
> make sure your wiki page points to a correct location:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ResultsDB
> (I updated it before learning there are other sources of ResultsDB. You might
> have some more under your sleeve.)
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> As a general note, I'm not fully happy when the source code lives somewhere
> else than the issues do. It confuses people. But if we want to keep
> easy-to-browse-and-fork functionality (bitbucket) and full-featured-review
> functionality (phab), it seems we don't have much choice. At least we should
> always disable the issue support on bitbucket for every project.

Weren't we going to move repos to phab as well?

M.