Documentation Tools

Kamil Paral kparal at redhat.com
Wed Jan 29 12:32:29 UTC 2014


> I've posted a comparison between Sphinx and Dexy [1] - as well as
> updated the phabricator ticket [2]. The tools are pretty similar in
> what they can produce, so it really comes down to what people are
> comfortable with. The learning curve for Dexy isn't steep, and I think
> it's just enough easier to use compared to Sphinx for our purposes.

I wondered why I hadn't seen it at Fedora Planet (neither your previous blogpost), and it's because your RSS feed is no longer updated:
http://roshi.fedorapeople.org/feeds/fedora.atom.xml


> I wasn't able to find air-tight reasoning for one over the other for
> qa-devel work - but found dexy a bit easier to use and template. Source
> for both tutorials can be found on my bitbucket profile [3].

Thanks. Can you move it into our team repo list?
https://bitbucket.org/fedoraqa


> 
> // Roshi
> 
> [1] http://roshi.fedorapeople.org/comparing-dexy-and-sphinx.html
> [2] https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T39
> [3] https://bitbucket.org/Rorosha/doc-tools
> 


More information about the qa-devel mailing list