Git repos location

Kamil Paral kparal at redhat.com
Thu Jan 30 13:00:49 UTC 2014


> > * Don't change anything at least as long as we don't have FAS support
> > in Phab. Until then, it doesn't really matter whether we manage
> > commit permission using Bitbucket accounts or Phab accounts.
> 
> I'm not sure that FAS matters much here. Even after we get FAS
> integration, there's not going to be any support for FAS groups in
> phabricator. AFAIK, phabricator doesn't support externally defined
> groups and even if it did, we'd have no way of getting that data since
> Persona doesn't have a mechanism to do anything other than auth.

Oh, I didn't know. OK, in that case it's even simpler - I don't see any major reason now to move the repos to Phab. Let's leave it at Bitbucket. The only thing we need to do is to update the README files in our repositories and point to Phab if people want to report issues.

> > If this sounds reasonable, I'll probably move
> > https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git/ to bitbucket as
> > well, so that we start to get rid of fedorahosted and move all code
> > into a single place.
> 
> If we're going to hold off on migration for everything elase, I'm
> inclined to wait a bit on that. I'd prefer to avoid moving stuff twice
> when commit privileges etc. are setup and functioning for the
> fedorahosted repos right now.

OK, sounds reasonable.


More information about the qa-devel mailing list