Fedora 10 Beta Freeze (Spins)
jkeating at redhat.com
Thu Sep 18 15:40:26 UTC 2008
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 16:02 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> I'm not sure whether it is a conscious choice of the creator/maintainer
> to not include that group, or whether they just didn't know about it in
> the first place.
That's what reviews and feedback is for, so that the maintainer can
either learn about it, or report back rational as to not using it.
> > Second, I really don't like the modifying of the debuginfo repo. There
> > are tools like debuginfo-install that will enable debuginfo repos on the
> > fly to get packages, rather than keeping the repo open all the time and
> > dealing with extra repodata churn. Not to mention that it immediately
> > taints the fedora.repo file so that we can't deliver any updates to it.
> > Please reconsider this modification.
> Can't seem to find the tool you're referring to. What is it's name exactly?
$ rpm -qf /usr/bin/debuginfo-install
debuginfo-install: Install debuginfo packages and their dependencies
the name of the non-debug package
debuginfo-install [options] package1 [package2] [package..]
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/rel-eng/attachments/20080918/4dc3c405/attachment.bin
More information about the rel-eng