[Fedora-spins] Fedora 10 Beta Freeze (Spins)
poelstra at redhat.com
Mon Sep 22 20:05:29 UTC 2008
Bryan Kearney said the following on 09/22/2008 05:53 AM Pacific Time:
> John Poelstra wrote:
>> Bryan Kearney said the following on 09/17/2008 05:50 AM Pacific Time:
>>> Does this help?
>> Now you're talking my language :)
>> For each step along the way how are you proposing to track the
>> approval or completion? IOW if I were to help with (4), how would I
>> tell if (2) and (3) had adequately been completed?
> Well.. if you want the spin to be in Fedora, then this assumes you do a
> feature. So.. let the feature tracking process cover it. No need to
> create a new process. It may break the definition of a feature a bit,
> since some of them are "repeats" year to year.. but it would create a
> single funnel for the board and release engineering to look at.
> -- bk
Fair enough. You still haven't answered my question about tracking
Stated another way... history has shown with the feature process that
people don't always do the right thing. Not in a malicious way, but
usually because they didn't understand what they were supposed to or
simply took a guess and moved on.
For the feature process I use the very manual, rudimentary process of
Category classifications and page watches.
What process are you proposing so that I know:
1) When a spin is officially being proposed as a feature?
2) All of the required previous required steps or approvals were
More information about the rel-eng