Paul W. Frields
stickster at gmail.com
Tue Sep 30 00:39:19 UTC 2008
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 02:47:38PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 17:04 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > Yeah, just to be clear, if we don't slip beyond November 25 for GA, we
> > shouldn't have to disturb the F12 schedule at all (at least not
> > pre-emptively).
> I agree we need to make f11 have a full schedule. It's important to
> Fedora, and even more important to one major Fedora downstream. The F12
> schedule we could probably squish a bit, especially if we ask people to
> focus on polish rather than features for that release. Not sure how
> well that would go over, but we could try at least.
After the Beta we should try to make this a wider discussion.
Developers will want to know up front whether they're going to be
squished for time to get things done for F11.
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/rel-eng/attachments/20080929/9f79ffb7/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the rel-eng