F12 0-day release updates

Ricky Zhou ricky at fedoraproject.org
Wed Aug 19 18:43:40 UTC 2009


On 2009-08-19 02:35:32 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> While I do think the mirror issue is important, I'll be honest and say the
> 'common sense' angle that Rex mentioned earlier is what I was after anyway.
> I don't understand why we need to have 380 0-day updates of $new_crap.
Ah, I did not pick this up from your original email.  I don't quite get
the common sense part either though - If we have the updates, what is
the gain of delaying them?  Would the benefit be to get the important
updates out faster and with a less error-prone push?

Thanks,
Ricky
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/rel-eng/attachments/20090819/f61dec5a/attachment.bin 


More information about the rel-eng mailing list