TeX Live 2008/9 packaging and you
Warren Togami
wtogami at redhat.com
Wed Jun 3 18:07:54 UTC 2009
On 06/02/2009 07:27 AM, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> but it comes with improved packaging scheme generated from TeX Live
> upstream packaging metadata with emphasis on future maintainability in
> Fedora 12+.
>
> Old version texlive-2007 (currently in f9, f10, f11):
> * monolythic design
> New version texlive-2008 (to be in f12):
> * one single texlive package generating 3944 subpackages / 1065 MiB
If all subpackages are built from the same .src.rpm, how is this a
maintainability win at all?
This isn't like the modularization of X, where it became independent
.src.rpm packages that could be updated individually.
The metadata hit would be extreme, and with a single .src.rpm does not
improve maintainability in the way that matters most?
Warren Togami
wtogami at redhat.com
More information about the rel-eng
mailing list