Fwd: F13 Schedule Proposal--please RESPOND

[Bill Nottingham]

Paul W. Frields (stickster at gmail.com) said: 
> > If it's wrong, 'we should update the methodology'. You asked for feedback
> > on the schedule, not the methodology.
> > 
> > Was this methodology ever posted in a FESCo or rel-eng meeting for public
> > review by the stakeholders? I don't recall it, but I could be wrong. So,
> > it really shouldn't be surprising that other people are surprised by the
> > output of this new methodology, when that output doesn't actually appear
> > to match what we've previously done.
> 
> IIRC that page consolidates previous written work from previously
> existing pages, and the comments of rel-eng personnel.  Is it really
> new, or the same information presented in a different format that
> makes it look new?

The entire 'schedule methodology' section was added on September 18,
according to the wiki history.

Bill