Fwd: F13 Schedule Proposal--please RESPOND

[Paul W. Frields]

On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 01:38:15PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Paul W. Frields (stickster at gmail.com) said: 
> > > If it's wrong, 'we should update the methodology'. You asked for feedback
> > > on the schedule, not the methodology.
> > > 
> > > Was this methodology ever posted in a FESCo or rel-eng meeting for public
> > > review by the stakeholders? I don't recall it, but I could be wrong. So,
> > > it really shouldn't be surprising that other people are surprised by the
> > > output of this new methodology, when that output doesn't actually appear
> > > to match what we've previously done.
> > 
> > IIRC that page consolidates previous written work from previously
> > existing pages, and the comments of rel-eng personnel.  Is it really
> > new, or the same information presented in a different format that
> > makes it look new?
> 
> The entire 'schedule methodology' section was added on September 18,
> according to the wiki history.

September 17 & 18, but if I read this right the meat came from these
pre-existing pages:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Time_based_release_schedule
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Schedule

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug