Proposal: Fedora 21+ image naming scheme

[Dennis Gilmore]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 03 Sep 2014 11:17:36 -0400
Andre Robatino <robatino at fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> On 09/03/2014 10:13 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> 
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_fedora_image_naming_policy
> > 
> >> Is there a reason the order of the name components couldn't be more
> >> similar to the download directory structure? For example, old pungi
> >> images were named like Fedora-20-i386-DVD.iso, corresponding to
> >> $VERSION/$ARCH (and $IMAGETYPE comes last since both of these, DVD
> >> and netinst, are in the same dir). So, in
> >> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/21-Alpha-TC5/Workstation/i386/iso/
> >> , instead of Fedora-Workstation-netinst-i386-21-Alpha-TC5.iso, what
> >> about Fedora-21-Alpha-TC5-Workstation-i386-netinst.iso? This is
> >> basically the same as the old naming in the case of install images
> >> (except for the new $PRODUCT field).
> > 
> > the naming was decided by Adam with minimal input from me. doing
> > what you are proposing is quite a bit of extra work. we actually
> > feed in Fedora-Workstation as a single option on the CLI. I really
> > do not see what it gains us.  Can you please try to better explain
> > why you feel we should change it now?
> 
> How about Fedora-Workstation-21-Alpha-TC5-i386-netinst.iso? Same as
> the download directory order, except for the placement of the $PRODUCT
> field, and essentially the same as the old naming order, so less
> confusing to users.

You're still not answering the question why we should change it.

Dennis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUB06eAAoJEH7ltONmPFDRRDYP/RJQSt+vvts/ys8OTXZJ9eSw
LKcMpk2bjdMRUvr23L1XzvYOVKf2RNCo2GfC+PTLwMtRNYUVBMRvlsZMQzejWKJy
4AD83um8qc0tRhwQhW5KrmvWIbbx8A7CjAaZy/29+Xw3bUoKIr+0mj194vlS+SLe
PUsrtOyQAFbBXUKszhWtmhe/rTvvduM8HlEs73lDNgIHzhezme5r2AiCP8SoLy+A
e63gFsjIBojZiZdURmr1/CEIbRxZQap4dGcslUsck+owE9jdMcPN9yyTvlwxwGdx
ioGFa1ZBDVEjh2Aflh5kalDehniMlDhJze5wVf7sYTkWoR69ULs0qVfW3dVnW2M1
0W/Gf3JqK4ib14woqAsP19sB9rlL5bIre3euTBybxTJHWfEqrTaHAJUbstj7br5W
FWHs/goH35awbcaYGdXXD0ZZXZK9eMQihvwGGYKGjy6zCB5hFSE4QwyeSJqq0wHt
GYJrvp8eVsf3tcxxTyL276OD+Zux6N4+LP3eAu96W4637EVdKNDCuu7dxgGqD2ov
tJnuNWq4hwo5+i0juXDmOGy/JQRkkcqxMMm+KNiU2rU+rmqjRoJKo9ePB8eiypuB
7LvmsiI831Bxfi2AHZ+wCcDBF8K3th5sv4KQBYG7OnYIas4aV6ROEMiDwKczS/4O
bzA7baUbfbyhyPtLRxTZ
=H29X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----