RFC: Proposal for Rel-Eng project management/planning

[Joe Brockmeier]

On 04/27/2015 12:48 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> I know we like things to be packaged in Fedora and there is nothing
> wrong with that.  However, deploying Cantas via a container would seem
> to be an ideal thing to try as an initial dogfooding effort.  It would
> let both rel-eng and Infra get used to the technologies while also
> providing a valuable service to themselves.  What do people think of
> that idea?

Not surprisingly, I like the idea.

Not to be contrarian, but I also question how much value RPM-izing
Cantas has. Would this be akin to packaging something like WordPress,
because I've never found it easier to install & maintain WordPress via
RPM than to just grab the tarball.

Best,

jzb
-- 
Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst
jzb at redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb  | http://dissociatedpress.net/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/rel-eng/attachments/20150427/1be479c0/attachment.sig>