EPEL ⊆ RHEL

[Dennis Gilmore]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 08:44:46 -0600
Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> wrote:

> On 01/16/2015 03:14 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Using the JSON output we generated from our Red Hat repos, I wrote
> > a small script comparing the packages present in EPEL vs those in
> > RHEL.
> >
> > Below is a list of the overlap between both. I have the script
> > available to re-generate it if desired.
> 
> 
> > 4926 packages in epel7
> > 2516 packages in RHEL7
> > Packages in RHEL and EPEL
> ...
> > - libvncserver
> ...
> 
> libvncserver (last I knew) was included for the sole purpose of 
> supporting additional archs (ie, rhel7 doesn't build for ppc64)
> 
> Does your script handle cases like this?
> 
> 
> -- rex
> 
> p.s.  I suppose arguably epel7's libvncserver should then include:
> ExclusiveArch: ppc64
> ?
> Currently it builds for all archs,
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=592933

it has to be built for all aches. koji wont include the rhel version if
there is a epel version even if only on limited arches. we need to
ensure that the epel build follow policy correctly

Dennis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUuVEVAAoJEH7ltONmPFDRI/IQAMKFL5Uu5OzHEd5cMh5CrFPH
hIu6l7mAEIyepyjqB7h8EywZyO+UK1tGgzEeRrOhIBH7Xj36IMPPOI9swoZ0uJqs
4W+3FOpRvWhAIQ0uap+QoJ9PZJ0lsf6oBvNKNDGawZ2A8Izq0StqjFzRLIZdpnZz
Trw+qOdkRmZ9lw5/uh5iJg8UqsvZt0vP7x5ngZGMhngK3zyztvCHa+quKFosQXll
OZ4/Eub10wjQcsm1hakjSZzZp4xToMgq4o//nEHPjBgJ2R52JsEdsKavhGWVwGi2
IsGJg/IpDlCq/UzN9u5hrUnObI3KyYuM0bqy9zxEEUWOupl0YZaJharlPRgOgn2i
ZV2sxta0ocpsv3V495Ihd+mAIoT39wSrU39q03Yoz4t3WO4idftyXt2u+3ZBc9Bp
q3NL6ElAh9LiaXV29jxzXgepABCbT4vR9/O0s+KBWrqJodMPw3bkeNW5UWVVgMyM
8VPvprlPBALVU5zCv+4LQqiLxrevGgYznqc7rII3lHlXbM76AI2Ay6SPbbD/SmkE
PNGQLXOFS1H7e7NiFOZ0rasIHPrnUmpWcEdsAYkB2tSPlUeKJf5iCDLJ6IEfUUiQ
hQE5BQHncOP8kJ3UjyJAvEPpBrBOkKwBqDXpxEdEYMq2nmaUh2bPOETuisKkjV58
RP2w5BHcd0Bxtk3963JI
=STSS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----