FAD Goals and deliverables

[Dennis Gilmore]

On Tuesday, May 19, 2015 11:04:45 AM Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 04:00:07PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 03:16:24PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> > >> > Hey Colin, I see this in the talking points for F22 already. Is that
> > >> > premature? Where is that container currently coming from?
> > >> 
> > >> https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/fedora/cockpitws/
> > >> We're relying on the Hub to be the middleman currently, and at least
> > >> I would like to see this come (or be available) directly from Fedora.
> > > 
> > > Yeah, me too — especially the production part. I'm a little hesitant to
> > > use it as a talking point until then.
> > 
> > What's this got to do with the FAD?
> 
> It drifted off-topic, but the original post was surprise at seeing
> something on both the FAD deliverables list and the current F22 talking
> points.

Right, and if such a thing does exist in f22 it can not be a talking point for 
Fedora 22, it needs to be sure not to use trademarks and would not be 
considered official in any way, shape or form. at the moment the same is true 
for DockerFiles also.

Dennis
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/rel-eng/attachments/20150519/993f9d87/attachment-0001.sig>