mmorsi at redhat.com
Wed Aug 25 04:35:38 UTC 2010
On 06/28/2010 09:25 PM, Mohammed Morsi wrote:
> On 06/28/2010 05:28 PM, David Lutterkort wrote:
>> On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 16:07 -0400, Mohammed Morsi wrote:
>>> Hey, so I spent far too long over the last few days trying to get
>>> activerecord v2.3.8 to compile against Fedora before I realized that I
>>> was basing my attempt off the wrong package.
>>> Specifically, we have two activerecord rpms in Fedora, ruby-activerecord
>>> and rubygem-activerecord
>>> Obviously, conforming to standards, rubygem-activerecord is the way to
>>> go, and I can't figure out why we are keeping ruby-activerecord around,
>>> especially since its horribly out of date (pulling version 2.0.1, the
>>> package itself has not been updated since 2007).
>>> Can we orphan / remove ruby-activerecord all together?
>> Since nobody's been complaining, I think the answer is yes. Feel free to
>> nuke it (together with ruby-activesupport)
More information about the ruby-sig