Current ruby 187 srpm status?

[Mamoru Tasaka]

( For this contents, I post also to ruby-sig)

Mamoru Tasaka wrote, at 06/29/2010 02:24 AM +9:00:

> Jim Meyering wrote, at 06/29/2010 01:49 AM +9:00:
>> http://meyering.net/private/ruby-1.8.7.299-3.el6.src.rpm

By the way, currently whose srpm are we planing to use for rawhide now?
http://meyering.net/private/ruby-1.8.7.299-3.el6.src.rpm or
http://mo.morsi.org/files/ruby-1.8.7.299-1.fc13.src.rpm ?
Unifying these is much preferable for maintenance.

And, comments to both srpm:
- Please don't define %ruby_sitelib and %ruby_sitearch as below:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
%{!?ruby_sitelib:      %global ruby_sitelib    %{ruby_vendorlib}/site_ruby}
%{!?ruby_sitearch:     %global ruby_sitearch   %{ruby_vendorarch}/site_ruby}
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   These definitions are confusing compared to this:
   https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby

   In ruby related spec file, we always define %ruby_sitelib, %ruby_sitearch
   as:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
%{!?ruby_sitelib: %global ruby_sitelib %(ruby -rrbconfig -e 'puts Config::CONFIG["sitelibdir"] ')}
%{!?ruby_sitearch: %global ruby_sitearch %(ruby -rrbconfig -e 'puts Config::CONFIG["sitearchdir"] ')}
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   On i686 these are expanded as /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8 and
   /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i386-linux .
   Please rename these macros in ruby.spec (like %sitelibbase %sitearchbase or so)

Regards,
Mamoru