RSpec 2?

[Michal Fojtik]

On 16/02/11 16:52 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>* rspec         -  1.3.0    ->    2.0.1  (stahnma)
>
>> - rspec 1.3.0 and rspec 2.0.1 have large difference, and it seems that
>>     many packages depends on rspec 1.3.0 (I may be wrong). So maybe we want
>>     to package rspec 2.0.1 as rubygem-rspec-2 (correct me if I am wrong).
>>     Also please check bug650283
>>
>>> * rspec-core, rspec-expectations, rspec-mocks, rspec-rails (2.0.1)
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650280
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650282
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650283
>> (all submitted by me), will check rspec-rails
>>
>
>Could we push this forward? Can I help somehow? It is quite late for F15
>unfortunately, is it wort of trying? RSpec 1.3 are not very useful for
>Rails 3 IMO.

Keep in mind that many packages are using 1.3 tests which are in some way
incompatible with 2.0, so before pushing this be sure it will not break all
builds which are using 1.3 ;-)


  -- Michal

>
>
>Vit
>_______________________________________________
>ruby-sig mailing list
>ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
>https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------
Michal Fojtik, mfojtik at redhat.com
Deltacloud API: http://deltacloud.org
--------------------------------------------------------