RSpec 2?

Michael Stahnke mastahnke at gmail.com
Wed Feb 16 16:14:15 UTC 2011


On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Michal Fojtik <mfojtik at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 16/02/11 16:52 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>>* rspec         -  1.3.0    ->    2.0.1  (stahnma)
>>
>>> - rspec 1.3.0 and rspec 2.0.1 have large difference, and it seems that
>>>     many packages depends on rspec 1.3.0 (I may be wrong). So maybe we want
>>>     to package rspec 2.0.1 as rubygem-rspec-2 (correct me if I am wrong).
>>>     Also please check bug650283
>>>
>>>> * rspec-core, rspec-expectations, rspec-mocks, rspec-rails (2.0.1)
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650280
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650282
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650283
>>> (all submitted by me), will check rspec-rails
>>>
>>
>>Could we push this forward? Can I help somehow? It is quite late for F15
>>unfortunately, is it wort of trying? RSpec 1.3 are not very useful for
>>Rails 3 IMO.
>
> Keep in mind that many packages are using 1.3 tests which are in some way
> incompatible with 2.0, so before pushing this be sure it will not break all
> builds which are using 1.3 ;-)
>
>
>  -- Michal
>
>>
>>
>>Vit
>>_______________________________________________
>>ruby-sig mailing list
>>ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
>>https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Michal Fojtik, mfojtik at redhat.com
> Deltacloud API: http://deltacloud.org
> --------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-sig mailing list
> ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
>
We may want to look at doing rspec2 as a new package.  Lots of things
are still using rspec 1.x, specifically many gems not related to
rails.  I should probably do some research on this and see how many
are left on 1.x.

Either way, I'll see if I can get a scratch build of rspec 2 going.
I'm also completely willing to give co-maintainer rights to anybody
who wishes to help out.

stahnma


More information about the ruby-sig mailing list