Shebang

[Michal Fojtik]

On 17/02/11 10:34 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Is there some guideline how shebang should look? There are commonly used
>two versions:
>
>1) #!/usr/bin/env ruby
>2) #!/usr/bin/ruby
>
>I like the first version, because it allows more freedom and usage of
>'environment-modules' for example. Nevertheless also the second variant
>has its advantages, e.g. reliable tool chain is assured even if
>environment changes.
>
>Any thoughts on this?

I would prefer the first one, because in Fedora, Ruby interpreter is always
in *known* place (/usr/bin/ruby). 

There was also some tries[1] to actually prohibit use of #!/usr/bin/env completely
in Fedora packaging.

Also FSH guarantee some interprets in /usr/bin, but AFAIK Ruby is not
there[2] yet. Maybe it will get there in next release.

[1] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2009-July/006248.html
[2] http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html

   -- Michal

>
>
>Vit
>_______________________________________________
>ruby-sig mailing list
>ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
>https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------
Michal Fojtik, mfojtik at redhat.com
Deltacloud API: http://deltacloud.org
--------------------------------------------------------