RSpec 2?
Mamoru Tasaka
mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Fri Feb 18 20:40:11 UTC 2011
Vít Ondruch wrote, at 02/17/2011 12:52 AM +9:00:
>
> * rspec - 1.3.0 -> 2.0.1 (stahnma)
>
>> - rspec 1.3.0 and rspec 2.0.1 have large difference, and it seems that
>> many packages depends on rspec 1.3.0 (I may be wrong). So maybe we want
>> to package rspec 2.0.1 as rubygem-rspec-2 (correct me if I am wrong).
>> Also please check bug650283
>>
>>> * rspec-core, rspec-expectations, rspec-mocks, rspec-rails (2.0.1)
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650280
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650282
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650283
>> (all submitted by me), will check rspec-rails
>>
>
> Could we push this forward? Can I help somehow? It is quite late for F15
> unfortunately, is it wort of trying? RSpec 1.3 are not very useful for
> Rails 3 IMO.
>
Now I've updated these 3 review requests (now using 2.5.x).
Review swaps welcomed.
Regards,
Mamoru
More information about the ruby-sig
mailing list