rails 3.0.x in F15

Vít Ondruch vondruch at redhat.com
Fri Jan 7 16:04:51 UTC 2011


Dne 18.12.2010 08:12, Mamoru Tasaka napsal(a):
> Hello, Mohammed:
>
> First of all, thank you for analyzing what to be done for rails 3.0.
>
> Mohammed Morsi wrote, at 12/18/2010 10:48 AM +9:00:
>>     Based on my discussions with the community and various parties that
>> have a vested interest in this, I feel that it is a good idea to move
>> the rubygem-rails packages to rails 3.0.x for F15 so that we don't get
>> left behind and stay up to date w/ the latest / greatest upstream releases.
>>
>> Unfortunately this process isn't as simple as updating the 6 rails
>> packages (rails itself and the active/action* packages), there are many
>> various gems which will need to be updated as well to work with Rails 3.
>> Based on my findings w/ deltacloud [1], the update process itself isn't
>> so difficult, but some of the following gems will need to be updated in
>> Fedora for things to properly work. Most likely more will need to be as
>> well, these are just the ones that I've found, but conversely all of
>> these may not need to be updated, as I installed Rails 3 via gem which
>> pulled in the latest version of all these packages.
>>
>> * rails, activesupport, activerecord, actionpack, activeresource, actionmailer   -  2.3.8 ->    3.0.1   (mmorsi)
>> * compass                 -  0.8.17  ->    0.10.6 (mmorsi)
>> * cucumber  -  0.9.0    ->    0.9.3   (kanarip, mfojtik, mkent, stahnma)
>> * erubis        -  2.6.5    ->    2.6.6  (mkent)
>> * gherkin      -  2.2.4    ->    2.2.9   (mfojtik)
>> * haml          -  3.0.17  ->    3.0.23  (mkent, kanarip)
>> * polyglot     -  0.2.5    ->    0.3.1   (kanarip, stahnma)
>> * rack           -  1.1.0    ->    1.2.1 (kanarip, stahnma)
>> * rack-test   -  0.5.4    ->     0.5.6   (mfojtik)
>> * rspec         -  1.3.0    ->    2.0.1  (stahnma)
> - rspec 1.3.0 and rspec 2.0.1 have large difference, and it seems that
>     many packages depends on rspec 1.3.0 (I may be wrong). So maybe we want
>     to package rspec 2.0.1 as rubygem-rspec-2 (correct me if I am wrong).
>     Also please check bug650283
>
>> * simple-navigation - 3.0.0   ->    3.0.2 (mfojtik)
>> * sinatra       -  1.0        ->    1.1.0 (mfojtik)
>> * sqlite3-ruby  - 1.2.4  ->    1.3.2   (kanarip, stahnma)
>> * term-ansicolor - 1.0.3 ->    1.0.5  (hpejakle, mfojtik)
>> * thor           - 0.13.6  ->    0.14.3 (mkent)
>     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649028
>
>> * treetop     - 1.3.0   ->    1.4.8  (stahnma)
> I hope these won't be too difficult.
>
>> Also the following are new gems which will need to be packaged
>>
>> * arel  (1.0.1)
>> * autotest (4.4.2)
>     - I have local srpm and if needed I guess I can submit
>       review request for rubygem-autotest quickly
>
>> * bundler  (1.0.3)
>     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646836
>     - blocked by bug 649028 (update thor to 0.14.x)
>
>> * database_cleaner (0.6.0)
>     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641957
>     - blocked by bundler review request
>
>> * factory_girl_rails (1.0)
>     - already in Fedora
>
>> * i18n (0.4.2)
>     - already in Fedora
>
>> * mail (2.2.29)
>> * tilt  (1.1)
>> * timecop (0.3.5)
>     - already in Fedora
>
>> * rack-mount (0.6.13)

I have prepared "rack-mount" if somebody is interested: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667997

Vit

>> * railties (3.0.1)
>> * rspec-core, rspec-expectations, rspec-mocks, rspec-rails (2.0.1)
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650280
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650282
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650283
> (all submitted by me), will check rspec-rails
>
>> * tzinfo (0.3.23)
>>
>> In the upcoming weeks (most likely starting after the new year) I will
>> be looking to updating the rails packages themselves and coordinating
>> updates with the owners of these gems. I also think it might be a good
>> idea to submit a feature request for Fedora 15 for Rails 3.
>>
>> Thoughts, comments, and help with any and all of this would be very much
>> appreciated. Thanks alot.
>>
>>      -Mo
>>
>> [1]  http://mo.morsi.org/blog/node/331
> Regards,
> Mamoru
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-sig mailing list
> ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig



More information about the ruby-sig mailing list