Migration from RSpec 1.3 to RSpec 2.x

Tue Jul 26 16:03:22 UTC 2011

Thanks, all my current SRPMs are here at http://www.sh0n.net/spstarr/fedora-work

Note rubygem-datamapper is now rubygem-data_mapper so ignore the latter SRPM.

I believe someone owns rubygem-extlib in EPEL but not for Fedora since it was dropped. I bumped it to .15 and enabled Yard documentation in it.

--- On Tue, 7/26/11, Vít Ondruch <vondruch at redhat.com> wrote:

> From: Vít Ondruch <vondruch at redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: Migration from RSpec 1.3 to RSpec 2.x
> To: ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 3:35 PM
> I will take a look tomorrow on your
> rubygem-extlib and will see if that 
> can work with RSpec 2
> 
> Vit
> 
> 
> 
> Dne 26.7.2011 16:43, Shawn Starr napsal(a):
> > I'm not sure on that. I'm just packaging them for
> OpenNebula, I have little ruby development experience. I
> would need assistance in that effort.
> >
> > --- On Tue, 7/26/11, Vít Ondruch<vondruch at redhat.com> 
> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Vít Ondruch<vondruch at redhat.com>
> >> Subject: Re: Migration from RSpec 1.3 to RSpec
> 2.x
> >> To: ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> Date: Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 7:39 AM
> >> Could you please try to migrate them
> >> to RSpec 2.x? It should not be a
> >> big problem (although I understand that it
> requires more
> >> work).
> >>
> >>
> >> Vit
> >>
> >>
> >> Dne 25.7.2011 19:01, Shawn Starr napsal(a):
> >>> Im about to submit whole bunch of rubygems to
> Fedora.
> >> Most of them use rspec 1.3.
> >>> On Mon Jul 25th, 2011 10:10 AM EDT Mo Morsi
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Since this list is a lot shorter than the
> >> corresponding list in Fedora,
> >>>> perhaps we can get these package
> maintainers to
> >> update to RSpec 2.
> >>>> Otherwise, perhaps we can leave it in
> there as
> >> there for now, push the
> >>>> rspec-core and other subcomponents to
> EPEL, and
> >> update the BoxGrinder
> >>>> RPM to depend on those subcomponents
> instead of
> >> rspec itself?
> >>>>      -Mo
> >>>>
> >>>> On 07/22/2011 09:18 AM, Marek Goldmann
> wrote:
> >>>>> For EPEL 6 - exactly 5:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> $ repoquery --repoid=epel-source
> --arch=src
> >> --whatrequires 'rubygem(rspec)'
> >>>>> rubygem-extlib-0:0.9.13-5.el6.src
> >>>>> rubygem-facon-0:0.4.1-2.el6.src
> >>>>> rubygem-rack-test-0:0.5.4-1.el6.src
> >>>>> rubygem-thin-0:1.2.8-4.el6.src
> >>>>> rubygem-uuidtools-0:2.1.1-1.el6.src
> >>>>>
> >>>>> For EPEL 5 - also 5:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> $ repoquery --repoid=epel-source
> --arch=src
> >> --whatrequires 'rubygem(rspec)'
> >>>>> rubygem-extlib-0:0.9.13-5.el5.src
> >>>>> rubygem-facon-0:0.4.1-2.el5.src
> >>>>> rubygem-linode-0:0.6.2-1.el5.src
> >>>>> rubygem-thin-0:1.2.8-2.el5.src
> >>>>> rubygem-uuidtools-0:2.1.1-2.el5.src
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --Marek
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 22 lip 2011, at 09:48, Vít Ondruch
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> RSpec 2 as they are in F16 can be
> imported
> >> into EPEL right now. Any idea
> >>>>>> how many packages depends on RSpec
> in
> >> EPEL?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Vit
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Dne 21.7.2011 20:49, Marek
> Goldmann
> >> napsal(a):
> >>>>>>> There is one more thing:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Now I upgraded to RSpec 2 in
> Fedora. I
> >> plan to submit BoxGrinder to EPEL 6, but there is
> only RSpec
> >> 1.3. What would be the approach to bump RSpec
> there?
> >>>>>>> --Marek
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 18 lip 2011, at 18:49, Mo
> Morsi
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Perhaps we can shoot for
> doing
> >> this w/ F17, and if we are unable to
> >>>>>>>> migrate all the dependent
> packages
> >> over, then add a rspec1 compat
> >>>>>>>> package to buy us some
> more time.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> In any case, would rather
> push
> >> this off to F17 myself as a few of us are
> >>>>>>>> going through and updating
> alot of
> >> the rails related plugins to be
> >>>>>>>> compatible w/ Rails 3 in
> Fedora.
> >> We're trying to get this done by the
> >>>>>>>> F16 deadline next week.
> >>>>>>> --Marek
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> ruby-sig mailing list
> >>>>>>> ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
> >>>>>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
> >> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> ruby-sig mailing list
> >>>>>> ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
> >>>>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
> >> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> ruby-sig mailing list
> >>>>> ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
> >>>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
> >>>>
> _______________________________________________
> >>>> ruby-sig mailing list
> >>>> ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
> >>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
> >>>
> _______________________________________________
> >>> ruby-sig mailing list
> >>> ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
> >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ruby-sig mailing list
> >> ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > ruby-sig mailing list
> > ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-sig mailing list
> ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
> 