datamapper vs data_mapper

Vít Ondruch vondruch at redhat.com
Wed Jul 27 08:15:15 UTC 2011


I have created upstream ticket for this: 
http://datamapper.lighthouseapp.com/projects/20609-datamapper/tickets/1520

Vit

Dne 27.7.2011 10:05, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> Probably, but its wrong anyway. For example sqlite3-ruby was renamed to
> sqlite3. Nevertheless if you try to install sqlite3-ruby, it installs
> sqlite3 anyway. Not sure how is that done, but it should be probably
> reported upstream.
>
> Vit
>
>
> Dne 27.7.2011 09:53, Marek Goldmann napsal(a):
>> Fun, I was looking at the release notes for latest datamapper and it seems they highlight "datamapper" over "data_mapper":
>>
>> 	http://datamapper.org/articles/datamapper-110-released.html
>>
>> It looks like they used the "dash version" earlier:
>>
>> 	http://datamapper.org/articles/datamapper-102-released.html
>> 	http://datamapper.org/articles/datamapper-100-released.html
>> 	...
>>
>> IMHO the dash version is published for compatibility reasons.
>>
>> --Marek
>>
>> On 27 lip 2011, at 09:25, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>>> Actually there are available both gems, datamapper as well as
>>> data_mapper ...
>> _______________________________________________
>> ruby-sig mailing list
>> ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-sig mailing list
> ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig



More information about the ruby-sig mailing list