Migration from RSpec 1.3 to RSpec 2.x

[Shawn Starr]

then I am getting conflicting views since OpenNebula folks said they asked upstream and they were told to use data_mapper?

if anything we would just patch OpenNebula to use 'datamapper' if we have to No big deal.



----- Original Message -----
From: Marek Goldmann <mgoldman at redhat.com>
To: Ruby SIG mailing list <ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org>
Cc: 
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 3:53:07 AM
Subject: Re: Migration from RSpec 1.3 to RSpec 2.x

Fun, I was looking at the release notes for latest datamapper and it seems they highlight "datamapper" over "data_mapper":

    http://datamapper.org/articles/datamapper-110-released.html

It looks like they used the "dash version" earlier:

    http://datamapper.org/articles/datamapper-102-released.html
    http://datamapper.org/articles/datamapper-100-released.html
    ...

IMHO the dash version is published for compatibility reasons.

--Marek

On 27 lip 2011, at 09:25, Vít Ondruch wrote:

> Actually there are available both gems, datamapper as well as 
> data_mapper ...

_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig