FUDCon:Milan 2011 - Ruby SIG meeting

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 21.9.2011 13:46, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> Dne 21.9.2011 13:43, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> I'd like to bring to your attention that there was proposed by Ruby SIG
>> meeting as part of FUDCon Milan [1]. I would like to take this meeting
>> as change to discuss Ruby future in Fedora. Here are few point I'd like
>> to discuss:
>>
>> * Ruby 1.9.3 for F17. I have already pre-prepared feature page [2] for
>> this and I am working towards packaging Ruby 1.9.3. However, there are
>> several issues including
>>       - How to correctly name and version subpackages such as RubyGems,
>> RDoc, Rake, IRB
>>       - How to maintain updates of them late.
>>       - Directory structure.
>>
>> * Support of gems for MRI and JRuby.
>>       - Is it possible to share RubyGems?
>>       - Is it possible to share gems?
>>
>> * Support of multiple versions of gems on single installation, e.g.
>> Rails 2 vs Rails 3.
>>
>> * Refresh of Ruby Packaging Guidelines
>>       - They do not always follow best practices
>>       - They will need to be updated because of Ruby 1.9.3
>>
>> * gem2rpm future and possible extensions
>>
>> This is list is not exhaustive, so please feel free to add few more
>> points, which you think might be interesting to discuss.
>>
>> Vit
>>
>>
>>
>> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Milan_2011
>> [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Ruby_1.9.3
>> _______________________________________________
>> ruby-sig mailing list
>> ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
> I have to add few more points immediately:
>
> * Rails 3.1 for F17
>
> * Migration of RSpec to RSpec 2.x
>
> Vit
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-sig mailing list
> ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
Another idea:

We should get rid of the .gem in cache subfolder, which makes no sense 
for RPM.

Vit